<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: mobilephones.co.uk not sold</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.droug.co.uk/mobilephones-co-uk-not-sold.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.droug.co.uk/mobilephones-co-uk-not-sold.html</link>
	<description>Doug Scott's thoughts and opinions</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 04 Oct 2011 20:38:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.4</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard</title>
		<link>http://www.droug.co.uk/mobilephones-co-uk-not-sold.html/comment-page-1#comment-4028</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 00:56:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.droug.co.uk/?p=1454#comment-4028</guid>
		<description>Gutted certainly. I think we&#039;re all pretty stunned by the turn of events:
- it would be normal to pay the money and proceed with what should be legally binding contract
- interesting details will come out of it, such as who covers the interest on 91k in limbo / who earns the CPC revenue from the holding page
- and serious fundamental issues about the credibility of auction houses and the domain auction process:
http://www.cressive.com/mobilephones-co-uk-to-decide-future-of-domain-auctions/
It&#039;s been quiet for a couple of days, so lets hope there is frantic activity behind the scenes by Sedo on resolving this to the industry&#039;s satisfaction.
Should be an interesting week...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gutted certainly. I think we&#8217;re all pretty stunned by the turn of events:<br />
- it would be normal to pay the money and proceed with what should be legally binding contract<br />
- interesting details will come out of it, such as who covers the interest on 91k in limbo / who earns the CPC revenue from the holding page<br />
- and serious fundamental issues about the credibility of auction houses and the domain auction process:<br />
<a href="http://www.cressive.com/mobilephones-co-uk-to-decide-future-of-domain-auctions/" rel="nofollow">http://www.cressive.com/mobilephones-co-uk-to-decide-future-of-domain-auctions/</a><br />
It&#8217;s been quiet for a couple of days, so lets hope there is frantic activity behind the scenes by Sedo on resolving this to the industry&#8217;s satisfaction.<br />
Should be an interesting week&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gerard</title>
		<link>http://www.droug.co.uk/mobilephones-co-uk-not-sold.html/comment-page-1#comment-4020</link>
		<dc:creator>Gerard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 16:57:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.droug.co.uk/?p=1454#comment-4020</guid>
		<description>Angie&#039;s reputations among domains in the UK is great, however I can&#039;t imagine she is really &quot;distraught&quot;. well unless she has some how paid already, which I don&#039;t think is the case.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Angie&#8217;s reputations among domains in the UK is great, however I can&#8217;t imagine she is really &#8220;distraught&#8221;. well unless she has some how paid already, which I don&#8217;t think is the case.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

