11

The arrogance of merchants

Tuesday, March 4th, 2008

Well today I started a blog. So rather than all the crap reasons why, here is the first one. Yesterday I posted about the arrogance of merchants over at Matt Woods affiliates4u forum, here is a brief snippet:

In my new role as diplomatic ambassador (not). It astonishes me and I wonder what I am missing, having ran and ownded numerous companies I would always talk nicely to people who could give me business. I would make their life easy and try every way to help them send me more business.

So today I am in my new play role and applied for the NEXT affiliate program on buy.at. Now buy.at know of me but we have never done much together, notably because affiliacy really is not our game. But they know our volumes over the years have been very very large. NEXT have no idea who we are or what we do….arrogance of merchants

So thought I would expand on this as it is something that still astonishes me.

In the real world of business most companies are split into seperate divisions and each division is now having to justify its existence. Hence you have the sales department out their knocking on doors and making deals, always aiming to make profit on every widget sold. You then have the marketing department, who are out their brand advertising, in many cases without ROI targets but focussing on awareness at what is called “opportunity to see”, ie the chance of a customer seeing our adverts. The rest of the company including IT is seen as a cost centre and not a profit centre.

So along comes the internet, and the IT department, who run the web site, develop the seo,ppc and affiliate channels. A smart IT director realises this is his or her chance to make money for the company and beome a profit centre and hence have a chance to make some bonus and maybe getter a better company car. So now we have IT doing sales…..and an internal fight starts.

In the meantime the marketing department has been buying banners and started doing ppc…again another fight ensues.

So each department internally is fighting and then they try to build an online strategy…but remember they are still fighting for power internally.

Now this bit confuses me:

  • banner buying is viewed as marketing and brand building and does not give true roi
  • ppc initially was viewed as an roi channel, but is now properly in the hands of marketeers and hence many campaigns are viewed as brand building exercises. And google are more and more pushing this idea. The bid prices go up, the roi goes down, but hey its better than TV and newspaper advertising.
  • affiliates for some reason are viewed still as profit centre and hence can be treated differently

In the normal business world the profitable sales channel would be seen as the channel to look after, but for some obscure reason in the online world it is treated as the scum.

So why are affiliates treated as the scum? My view is quite simple so many affiliates run this business part time and treat it as an extra income, so they are happy to be given it hard up the a**e and take the crumbs from the merchants table. It’s beer money. But the times are changing and the small affiliates are dying and being replace by specialist affiliate companies,with 10 to 500 staff. These affiliates are very different in their view, they run it like a business. As time rolls on these affiliates pick a sector and aim to dominate all the search engines and all the top slots, the law of avergaes says they will get a few rankings. But these sites aren’t horrible one page wonders but real value sites that the search engines want to rank. Eventually all the top slots are held by large affiliates, who then dictate the terms for merchants.

Yes merchants can still spend fortunes on ppc, but they will not rank long term in the organic results, simply because they can only hold at bext one slot for one keyword, where as a affiliate can hold them all. So ultimately the traffic will be controlled by the large affiliates, who have real value sites. If you are a company like expedia and watching your market share grow by a staggering 12%? Wow guys thats amazing, if our sales numbers had grown only buy 12% we would have sacked everyone. Maybe buyout some of these sites, ie note the recent sales of www.travel-library.com and www.holidaywatchdog.com, these sites will be encompassed into the global suite of sites and ultimately fall foul of the corporate beast and slowly loose some rankings.

So merchants can continue to buy up the online sales channels or start to work closer with some of the major affiliates, or maybe both.

Course you could just sit in your corporate tower and ignore this internet thing, who cares you are still being paid and with dodgy tracking systems or the inability of anyone to understand the 200 plus Omniture reports, no one will ever find out. If you run out of money why not

So back to NEXT a staggering increase in your share price, you must be doing something right. Or maybe you need to do something different.

Then what about buy.at has your vision become clouded looking at the money. You are nice bunch of guys:), sorry couldn’t resist. I like you and have complete respect for what you have done, but dont turn into the nasty merchants bitch. The SS did that and it didn’t work long term. Mind you, have you already left the bunker and got the pad in Argentina? Watch out people can still hunt you down and Chris has some nasty friends:)

Doug having fun:)

Popularity: 2% [?]


11 Responses to “The arrogance of merchants”

  1. Jason Duke said on March 4th, 2008 at 12:55 pm

    Ahhhh, you’re becoming old and jaded and dammed sexy?

  2. Smiley said on March 4th, 2008 at 1:22 pm

    The marketing execs hate the idea of some geek sitting in their bedroom making 10 times more money than them – but times have moved on, merchants should too…….

  3. GerBot said on March 4th, 2008 at 1:44 pm

    As someone who has been on all three sides of the fence I understand your frustration here.
    I think the solution lies with networks vetting the affiliates before merchants see them so that affiliate managers do not sit with their fingers over the un approve button.

    I’v seen CJ try to introduce metrics to help with this but I don’t think there is a perfect solution as of yet.

  4. ukgimp said on March 4th, 2008 at 1:59 pm

    What did you learn from being a sexy merchant Doug?

  5. Jason Duke said on March 4th, 2008 at 2:03 pm

    very very sexy but fat :D

  6. Doug said on March 4th, 2008 at 2:07 pm

    Never knew you cared Rich, but when we were a merchant we had problems. Being very blunt about it I did not run the affiliate program and the guy who did did not understand and hence we did very little….but the thing we did do was auto approve everyone who wanted to give us money:) I thought that was a good idea

  7. Keir McConomy said on March 4th, 2008 at 2:48 pm

    Oh f**k, who gave Doug a blog!

    That’s like giving plutonium to the Iranians!

  8. maxd said on March 4th, 2008 at 3:16 pm

    Your aff program was crap as I remember. Hope your next one will be better. We are launching one now for the second time. First one failed because of an idiot incharge. So your post couples with mine, you need the right guy in charge if you want a successful aff campaign. Idiots will just cost you time and money.

  9. Doug said on March 4th, 2008 at 9:25 pm

    Max

    Our aff program was actually good in many ways, we paid much more than anyone else, we converted well and we apid out on time and gave lots of notice of any changes. The issue we had was we never actively managed our affiliates, which was bad. But we only had one major affiliate who delivered much business and I did make sure I called him and talked to him and even met him. If we had seen large affiliate business coming from any single company we would have atleast met them. My issues is most merchants who do have large affiliate business’s dont even talk to them

    Doug

  10. ukgimp said on March 5th, 2008 at 1:11 pm

    hmmm, bit of editing going on there, not sure i remember including the word “sexy” but nice and sly, i like that :-)

  11. Jim Banks said on March 9th, 2008 at 10:51 am

    In most cases as the affiliate network is making their margin they try to protect the relationship between them and the affiliate for fear the merchant goes direct.

    Larger merchants no doubt want to protect the integrity of their brand, even though in most cases they don’t know why they should. In most industries now if you are the 800 pound gorilla you’ll own the top spots for your brand term, but affiliates can often supplement that position if merchants let them and as long as it is not a bun fight. That is where the affliate – network relationship comes in. As Doug said NEXT wouldn’t know him from Adam so an application hitting their desk is likely t be declined.

    Personally I think far too many merchants make the decisions on who to approve without consuting the network. The network has all the history of the affiliate and what they have done…..

    Don’t pay for expert advice and then ignore it when it is given.

Leave a Reply

How do I change my avatar?

Go to gravatar.com and upload your preferred avatar.