Polls
Who is the pretty boy of affiliate networks?
- Jason Baker
CommissionJunction
(26%, 78 Votes) - Lee Griffin
TradeDoubler
(16%, 47 Votes) - James Little
AffiliateFuture
(14%, 41 Votes) - Darren Newmark
LinkShare
(12%, 35 Votes) - Doug:)
Sexy beast
(11%, 33 Votes) - Adam Ross
AffiliateWindow
(11%, 32 Votes) - Mark Walters
AfilliateWindow
(11%, 32 Votes) - Chris Mockford
Buy.at
(9%, 26 Votes) - Tyson Pearcey
Buy.at
(5%, 14 Votes) - Warwick Lambert
Buy.at
(4%, 11 Votes) - Clarke Duncan
PaidOnResults
(3%, 10 Votes) - Giles Parnell
AffiliateFuture
(-22%, 10 Votes)
Total Voters: 297
Loading ...- Jason Baker
The Great Climate Change Swindle Swindle…note double swindle
Well I have to admit to being a bit of a closet lefty …..communist scum bag, who has become a capitalist pig dog and is ultimately confused. But one thing I do believe is that the world and everything operates in Karma and in equilibrium. So we simply cant abuse the planet and not expect something to change….we can pump shit out until the cows come home and the planet will work out away to solve the problem, remove most of the human race, hey presto removal of problem. So when I see shows like “The Great Climate Change Swindle” appear I become concerned about how stupid we are.
So when ABC in Australia decided to question Martin Durkin 1 , 2, about his film I had to listen. Here is the interview:
Now knowing that by manipulating information as we seem to do it for a living, this stuff could all be rubbish…..but putting my Karma hat on, I know we should be sorting this stuff out.
A question for the day:
If the planet was a business how much would it be charging to clean up the rubbish we are creating.
Do you think we could actually afford it?
Doug having fun
Popularity: 1% [?]
Interesting interview..I watched the original episode of this programme when it was aired in the uk last summer..Unfortunately I imagine many people will have been taken in by the programme..Shame on channel 4 for allowing this to be aired..
We are a greedy race and should all feel responsible for the current state of the planet..
Global warming is a subjective science. Guessing is not a science. The only thing objective about global warming is the correlation between greenhouse gases and warming.
Many people see such a simple correlation and draw their conclusions.
Scientists rely on the accuracy of surrogate experiments like computer models and the data that is fed into these models. The outcome of these surrogate experiments relies on the accuracy of the sub components used. Conclusions on the impact of gobal warming on our planet now and in the future are based on degrees of probability and confidence. I accept these predictions are probably quite accurate, these experiments simply do not explain what is causing global warming. This part remains subjective science.
It is far too narrow minded to draw conclusive theories based on co2 and temperature increasing, anyone who does deserves not to even participate in this debate.
Our planet operates in equilibrium and the increase in co2 could be the bi-product of millions of integrate interactions on our planet. No single scientist has proven global warming to be objective. Not now and not even when global warming has happened throughout history. Nothing has ever been proven, the planets equilibrium is so vastly complex we cannot begin to understand how it works.
There is a general consensus on GW, in as much as it exists and that man made co2 contributes and is potentially acting as a slight catalyst. This theory along with predictions for our future is all we have. Everything else is subjective and as i said, guessing is not a science.
What happens if they are right then Roger and co2 and global warming are related? When something happens to a large American/European city maybe we may think we have a problem…obviously if its in another country or maybe in the South of the USA it does not matter.
Unfortunately we will have to very major catastrophe in a country where a large number of white people get killed before we actually try to fix a problem.
I am no scientist, but every report, even the government ones say we may have a problem:
http://www.ipcc.ch
and the governments dont want to here that
Doug
Why do you rent cars for then?
Ignorance when we started.
There will always be people who rent cars, if we vanished we would be replaced by someone else. As we are now here we have influence….watch this space over the next months