<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Wow I missed that story</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.droug.co.uk/wow-i-missed-that-story.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.droug.co.uk/wow-i-missed-that-story.html</link>
	<description>Doug Scott's thoughts and opinions</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 04 Oct 2011 20:38:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.4</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Captain America</title>
		<link>http://www.droug.co.uk/wow-i-missed-that-story.html/comment-page-1#comment-1373</link>
		<dc:creator>Captain America</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Nov 2008 14:18:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.asapventures.co.uk/blog/?p=409#comment-1373</guid>
		<description>History repeating itself 

About time they pumped 500billion back into economy for defence (who owns the defence companies), the other great tactics used... prolonging the war stretching as long as they can to pump money into construction and to control services. 

Lets de-value a whole nation and buy up its resources and services on the cheap and control their people for your financial gain. Wont be suprised if some type of cheap labour is exported from iraq at some point in the near future. 

Oh and then there is the matter of an established ally in the middle east. Wonder if the great ol USA will start establishing air bases and sam sites there. Convientiently positioning for a few reasons. 

You dont even have to know all of this, 2 planes fully fuelled cannot bring down 3 WTC buildings in a controlled mannor. Firstly the jet fuel cannot burn hot enough to melt steel and black smoke seen on TV indicated a lack of oxygen meaning the temp&#039;s were no where near hot enough . The building collapse on tv was timed at 8-9 seconds on the live TV feed. For its mass and hight this would be bang on for a free falling building, i.e. a building with no resistance. The offical theory was a pancake collapse, i.e. resistance between flaws. Maybe they got it wrong... yea right. Nearly everyone recorded, fire chiefs, police officers, emergency workers all reported explosions before the collapse. That isn&#039;t broadcast, who controls the media? 

WTC was coming up for renewal, how much did it cost, did Larry Silverstein (the guy who owns the lease btw) only a short time prior secure a clause on the insurance contract to cover his buildings in the event of an attack. Yup. 

Did Mr Bush admit on live TV on the 16th of Sep that no one ever imagines someone would use a plane as a weapon, yes he did. What were norad doing on the day of 9/11 - practicising a hypothetical hi-jack situation where an airline was taken and flown into a buiding and all pilots were up in the air hundreds of miles away and were made to believe this was part of their training mission. A deliberate confusion tactic just like the british on 7/7. A carbon copy mission was going on in london which anti-terror police were practicising drills on underground attacks.  

Who is normally in command of norad training missions, mr norad commander usuaully. Who signed himself over to take command of norad on 9/11 - your very own Donald. 

A few people dotted around the globe made a shed load cash on 9/11. Put options skyrocketted well over average leading up to the event. Who knew.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>History repeating itself </p>
<p>About time they pumped 500billion back into economy for defence (who owns the defence companies), the other great tactics used&#8230; prolonging the war stretching as long as they can to pump money into construction and to control services. </p>
<p>Lets de-value a whole nation and buy up its resources and services on the cheap and control their people for your financial gain. Wont be suprised if some type of cheap labour is exported from iraq at some point in the near future. </p>
<p>Oh and then there is the matter of an established ally in the middle east. Wonder if the great ol USA will start establishing air bases and sam sites there. Convientiently positioning for a few reasons. </p>
<p>You dont even have to know all of this, 2 planes fully fuelled cannot bring down 3 WTC buildings in a controlled mannor. Firstly the jet fuel cannot burn hot enough to melt steel and black smoke seen on TV indicated a lack of oxygen meaning the temp&#8217;s were no where near hot enough . The building collapse on tv was timed at 8-9 seconds on the live TV feed. For its mass and hight this would be bang on for a free falling building, i.e. a building with no resistance. The offical theory was a pancake collapse, i.e. resistance between flaws. Maybe they got it wrong&#8230; yea right. Nearly everyone recorded, fire chiefs, police officers, emergency workers all reported explosions before the collapse. That isn&#8217;t broadcast, who controls the media? </p>
<p>WTC was coming up for renewal, how much did it cost, did Larry Silverstein (the guy who owns the lease btw) only a short time prior secure a clause on the insurance contract to cover his buildings in the event of an attack. Yup. </p>
<p>Did Mr Bush admit on live TV on the 16th of Sep that no one ever imagines someone would use a plane as a weapon, yes he did. What were norad doing on the day of 9/11 &#8211; practicising a hypothetical hi-jack situation where an airline was taken and flown into a buiding and all pilots were up in the air hundreds of miles away and were made to believe this was part of their training mission. A deliberate confusion tactic just like the british on 7/7. A carbon copy mission was going on in london which anti-terror police were practicising drills on underground attacks.  </p>
<p>Who is normally in command of norad training missions, mr norad commander usuaully. Who signed himself over to take command of norad on 9/11 &#8211; your very own Donald. </p>
<p>A few people dotted around the globe made a shed load cash on 9/11. Put options skyrocketted well over average leading up to the event. Who knew.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul</title>
		<link>http://www.droug.co.uk/wow-i-missed-that-story.html/comment-page-1#comment-850</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Jul 2008 10:41:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.asapventures.co.uk/blog/?p=409#comment-850</guid>
		<description>It wouldn&#039;t surprise me.  Dubya likes to follow in his father&#039;s footsteps and pretend
that he&#039;s &quot;outside the loop&quot; (also like his father, he lied the US into a war in Iraq).

It is quite clear, from recorded facts, that Dick Cheney was intimately involved
in both the planning and the execution of 9-11.  What is unknown is whether
Bush was behind it, or Cheney was the driving force and Bush approved it, or
Bush was kept completely in the dark until after the event.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It wouldn&#8217;t surprise me.  Dubya likes to follow in his father&#8217;s footsteps and pretend<br />
that he&#8217;s &#8220;outside the loop&#8221; (also like his father, he lied the US into a war in Iraq).</p>
<p>It is quite clear, from recorded facts, that Dick Cheney was intimately involved<br />
in both the planning and the execution of 9-11.  What is unknown is whether<br />
Bush was behind it, or Cheney was the driving force and Bush approved it, or<br />
Bush was kept completely in the dark until after the event.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

